ORDClogo.jpg
The Ohio Rail Development Commission
Project Development Process
 
A total of $1.3-Million dollars is what’s budgeted annually for railroad spur and rail line rehabilitation projects in Ohio for FY 2012 / 2013.  The annual challenge for the Ohio Rail Development Commission is stretching these dollars through grants and/or loans to do the most good.
To demonstrate both costs and benefits, here are a couple of examples of rail spur and rail line rehab projects that used the ORDC Project Development Process (PDP):
 
Rail Spur:
In 2008, Case Farms LLC requested a $200,000 grant to help defray the costs of rebuilding 1,750 feet of a previously out of service lead track and building a new 800 foot long storage track alongside this out of service lead track. These track improvements were needed before rail service to a new Case Farms feed mill in Massillon could begin.  Additional funding was approved in 2009, helping to create many new jobs and open up additional land for rail service.
 
            Project Costs                                                                          Project Benefits
            * ORDC Grant                                 $200,000          * 20 New Jobs at Case Feed Mill
            * Case, Local, & RR Funds             $100,000        * 200 New Jobs at Processing Plant
                                                                                              * 350 to 1,300 Carloads Generated
                                                                                              * 150 to 350 Acres Opened to Rail
 
Rail Line Rehabilitation:
ORDC Commissioners approved a $235,000 grant to the City of Greenfield for the repair of bridges along the Greenfield Line to accommodate the re-opening of Johnson Controls and the restoration of 120 rail-dependent jobs.  An additional $35,000 was added by Commissioners in May of 2011.
 
            Project Costs                                                              Project Benefits
            ORDC Grant                         $235,000                     Maximizes ORDC’s funding 
            ORDC EOY cleanout   up to $35,000                     Helps restore 120 jobs
            City of Greenfield         up to $58,000                    
                                                  up to $328,00
Both received their project financing through the ORDC.  (The project briefings are attached as an appendix to this document.)
But before we get into the details of ORDC’s PDP process, it helps to know first what the ORDC is and what we do.
 
What is the ORDC?
The ORDC was created in 1994 by the Ohio General Assembly under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4981 to plan, promote, and implement the improved movement of goods and people faster and safer on a rail transportation network connecting Ohio to the nation and the world. 
Our 15-member Commission brings a wealth of railroad, business, planning, government and engineering experience to the table.  The Commissioners meet bi-monthly to review and approve projects and policy.  The ORDC is also staffed by 16 full-time employees, also with deep experience in all aspects of railroad & economic development and railroad safety.
In plain terms, the ORDC has an over 17-year track record of being a key partner in preserving and improving Ohio’s 5,266 mile rail network, with 1,984 miles of that network providing a critical transportation link to smaller communities and local businesses that are often major regional employers.  Our grant and loan programs have played an often crucial role in rail projects that have produced positive benefits in terms of new business and the creation or retention of important local jobs.
 
What follows is an outline of how to partner with the ORDC to get a rail project started.  We look forward to working with you and helping you succeed.
  
Getting Your Project On Track
 Fig 1.jpg
 Figure 1: Rail Line Rehab Project on Camp Chase Railroad
 
ORDC Grant & Loan Programs
 
Grants:
A.   Rail Line Rehabilitations
ORDC grants are usually set up on a 50-50% matching basis and are typically for $250,000 or less.  Matching funds generally come from the railroad.
B.   Rail Spur Projects
Part of our overall assistance package to a community or a company that is locating to or expanding operations in Ohio.
Note: grant funding is always limited and very competitive.
 
Loans:
Loans can be used for rehabilitation or rail spur projects. ORDC loans require a $500 application fee and carry a 1% commitment fee as well as proper collateral such as a letter of credit. ORDC can cover 100% of the project costs.  Loan funding is typically limited to $750,000 dollars or less and a term of five to seven years.
 
ORDC Track Rehabilitation Program:
 
Soliciting Projects
Each Spring, the ORDC issues an RFP (Request For Projects) for rail line rehabilitation projects.  Railroads typically provide a detailed project request as a response. These projects could involve repairing bridges and other rail structures that are critical to rail operations and reliable shipping service, or rehabilitating track, ties and ballast along a rail corridor that serves numerous shippers. Typically, projects are selected by the ORDC in the summer after staff visits the project sites and speaks with the local parties involved, which could include shippers and local economic development officials.  The ORDC can also step in with emergency funding, such as when track, bridges and other rail structures are damaged by flooding or in the aftermath of a derailment.
 
 fig 2.jpg

Figure 2: ORDC-funded rail spur for New Horizons Bakery at Norwalk, Ohio.
 
Getting A Rail Line Rehabilitation Project Grant Considered:
 
The application for a rail line rehabilitation grant is available on-line and can be downloaded at:  http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Rail/Programs/Pages/default.aspx
 
Here is a listing of the information ORDC typically needs from a railroad to have projects considered:
  1. Physical description of the rail line/structures including:
    • Mileposts and end points of entire line;
    • Location map, track charts, and ZITS maps (if available),of entire line;
    • Connections to other railroads from the line;
    • Rail users located along the line, including their locations, annual carloads, commodities shipped/received for the last 3 years;
    • Overhead traffic on the line by volume and commodity for last three years; and
    • Profit/Loss statements for the last three years for operation of the rail line which is the subject of the project application.
  2. Physical description of Rehabilitation Project including:
    • Description of work by milepost;
    • Detailed cost estimate of work; and
    • Description of how work will be performed (i.e., by bid, force account, etc.)
  3. List existing FRA Class of track & FRA Class of track after project is completed.
  4. Description of Project Benefits including:
    • Itemization of savings to railroad (i.e. reduced crew time, derailments, maintenance);
    • Description of benefits/importance of the project to rail users and overhead traffic;
    • Breakdown of the number of people employed by rail users;
    • Anticipated useful life of the improvement; and
    • Anticipated safety benefits resulting from the improvement.
  5. Projection of future increased usage of the line by existing and potential new customers.
  6. Description of industrial parks/sites located along the line including existing infrastructure (water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.).
  7. Sources of revenue generated by the line in addition to carload traffic, e.g. car storage.
  8. For the last three (3) years:
    • Average net profit/mile
    • Average net maintenance and capital improvement investment/mile
  9. Contact information for rail shippers along the line. (Note: we have included a shipper survey in Appendix C that may be helpful in your project effort.)
 
Factors ORDC Considers before Making a Funding Commitment
  1. Railroad investment in the line in question compared to net profits.  If railroad profits per mile exceed railroad investment in capital and maintenance for the track, ORDC generally does not consider the project for grant funding at all.  With net profits exceeding investment, ORDC may not consider a project for loan funding either.
  2. Economic need of operating railroad for line in question.  If the line in question is in very good economic condition, i.e. the financial provided by the railroad show a reasonable level of profitability, or if the carload density on the line is favorable (e.g. 200 revenue cars per mile or above) demonstrating the line should have a reasonable level of profitability, then a loan rather than grant funding will be considered.
  3. Physical need of the line for rehabilitation.  Is immediate work needed to forestall derailments or the lowering of track speeds or can the work be deferred so that lines that have more critical needs can be repaired?
  4. Quantifiable and anecdotal benefits.  Quantifiable benefits include things such as new and retained jobs, railroad cost savings and related benefits.  Job retention is a major factor for rail lines that are only marginally economically viable and for which there are clearly shippers who are dependent upon continued rail service.  Anecdotal benefits include such issues as addressing maintenance deferred by a previous owner, improved safety of operations, enhancing economic development potential and other related benefits.
  5. Funding availability.  ORDC generally has very limited funding and must make hard choices as to how best to utilize limited dollars across a wide array of potential projects.  All project proposals are subject to comparative analysis with other projects.
        fig 3.jpg
 
Figure 3: Westco-owned rail line at Jeffersonville, Ohio: line & bridges rehabbed with ORDC funds.
 
Economic Development/Rail Spur Funding Program
 
The ORDC does not actively solicit rail spur projects, but rather responds to requests to consider projects from businesses or their site selection consultants.  ORDC will also consider requests from the Ohio Department of Development, the railroads and/or local economic development officials.
 
As with funding for Rail Line Rehabilitation projects, funding for ORDC’s Rail Spur Program is limited, so funding levels are deemed subject to policy decisions by ORDC staff in consultation with the economic development partners and any funding the partners may bring to the table.
 
Listed below is the information that must be provided by the applicant company, railroad or economic development entity:
 
·         Briefly describe overall company, including parent organization if applicable. Include products made, locations of plants, markets served, overall size in terms of sales volumes and employees, and other relevant data.
  • Provide detailed description of the project including:
    • How new plant or expansion (project) fits into the company’s operations
    • Investment broken down by building, land, equipment and machinery, and inventory;
    • Building description (sq. ft.), land (acreage), equipment and machinery, and uses;
    • Products to be produced, services rendered, markets served, and major competitors;
    • Map, diagram, building layout plan or other graphic showing the location of the new plant or plant expansion including the existing and proposed rail infrastructure;
    • Description of rail construction including the length of new track, new turnouts, description of related track rehabilitation and related information;
    • Detailed cost estimate of all new rail infrastructure and any track rehabilitation work and projected time frame for new plant construction/expansion.
  • Describe benefits resulting from new plant or expansion, including:
    • Number of jobs company will commit to create within three years;
    • Number of jobs company will commit to retain;
    • Average hourly wage for jobs created or retained;
    • Number of new rail carloads company will commit to generate within three years as well as major origins and destinations and additional benefits to Ohio.
  • Statement regarding whether any of the jobs created will result from displacing jobs at any other Ohio facility.
  • Provide a list of incentives and their value to the company or project provided by: local sources; other state agencies; federal agencies; and the serving railroad company.
Factors ORDC Considers before Making a Funding Commitment
  1.   # of new jobs
  2.   # of retained jobs
  3.  How much do the jobs pay?
  4.  Is there a chance the business expansion will happen in another state? 
  5.  What is company’s commitment to new carloads?
  6.  Are new carloads where they are needed for the viability of a line?
  7.  What local funds are involved?
  8.  What railroad funds are involved? Will there be railroad rate rebates to offset rail costs?
  9.  What ODOD is doing in terms of grants?
  10.  Does the level of car-loadings and railroad participation warrant a grant or a loan?
  11.  Will ORDC funding have a significant impact on the overall business expansion or just be an item on the development consultant’s check list?
  12. What is the overall level of ORDC funding available when project funding is required?
  13.  What economic development potential exists along the rail line?
fig 4.jpg
Figure 4: Poet Ethanol at Leipsic, Ohio: Funded through partnership with village, township,  3 railroads, POET Ethanol, ODOD and the ORDC.
 
  
PROJECT APPROVAL PROCESS
 
Step 1:  Commission Approval
 
All rail development and rehabilitation projects must be approved by the Commission before funding may be dispersed.  Projects exceeding $150,000 in ORDC funding must receive six affirmative votes from Commissioners.  Projects under $150,000 require only approval of the ORDC Commission Chair & Executive Director.  Projects under $25,000 require only the Executive Director’s approval.
 
Step 2:  Agreement
 
A)      Upon Commission approval, an ORDC Researcher prepares the project file. This file holds the project agreement, any amendments to the agreement, all correspondence, and all necessary documentation. This includes the Commission Briefing and the Commission Resolution detailing what the commission approved, the initial application for ORDC funding, the grantee’s tax information, EPA clearance, Insurance Certificate, and proof of grantee or contractor’s BWC/FELA coverage.
 
B)      An agreement must then be drafted between the ORDC and the grantee. An ORDC Project Planner normally develops the initial draft which is then sent to ORDC’s Assistant Associate Attorney General for his review and approval.
 
C)      This draft is then sent to the grantee. The grantee may want to negotiate the specifics of the agreement. These terms will generally fall into one of two categories:
 
     a.       Legal Questions-Which involve the AAG advising ORDC as to how to proceed.
     b.      Policy Calls- Typically ORDC management makes a determination about whether an exception can be made.
 
Once a final version is agreed upon, three copies of the agreement are made and sent to the grantee for signature. The grantee will sign the agreement.
 
D)     When the three copies are returned, ORDC’s Executive Director will sign them after verifying that the following documentation has been received and filed:
 
     a.       The Commission briefing and resolution
     b.      Any commitment letter ORDC issued prior to Commission approval
     c.       The grantee’s application for funding
     d.      Grantee tax information
     e.       Project EPA Clearance
     f.       Grantee or contractor’s insurance certification
     g.      Proof of grantee or contractor performing labor’s BWC or FELA coverage
 
E)      After all three copies have been signed by the Executive Director, one original copy is mailed back to the grantee, one is kept for ORDC’s project file, and the third copy is given to ORDC’s Fiscal Specialist to encumber funds and prepare for invoicing.
 
Step 3:  Prevailing Wage
 
Prior to the start of the project, ORDC’s Prevailing Wage Officer files a request with the Department of Commerce for a determination as to whether or not the labor force must be paid prevailing wage. The current standard is that any new development rail spur or main line project must pay prevailing wage if more than $78,258 in public funding is received.  For the rehabilitation of old track prevailing wage must be paid if more than $23,447 in public funding is received. However, the Department of Commerce must determine if prevailing wage applies, not the ORDC.
 
It can take a week or more to receive a prevailing wage determination response from the Department of Commerce. Once this determination is received, if the project does qualify for prevailing wage, the Prevailing Wage Officer will:
 
A)      Mail a packet with a letter that details the various requirements to the grantee.
 
B)      Verify, as invoices come in, that prevailing wage was paid by the grantee or grantee’s contractor(s)
 
Step 4:  Construction Authorization
 
Entities receiving ORDC funding must notify the ORDC Secretary/Treasurer 5 business days prior to the start of project construction.
 
Step 5:  Invoicing and Project Monitoring
 
When the Fiscal Specialist receives the copy of the agreement, funds will then be encumbered utilizing the statewide accounting system. ORDC grant money is encumbered in the GRF fund and loans are encumbered in the 4N4Q fund. As the project progresses and invoices come in, they go to ORDC’s Secretary/Treasurer who reviews them for the scope of the project covered and reserves the right to do due diligence and question any part of the invoice.
 
Next, the invoice is given to the Fiscal Specialist, who sends it upstairs to accounting with a coded strip to pay the vender. Once it goes through accounting, a check is released to the Secretary/Treasurer for mailing. At this time, if the project requires prevailing wage, the certified payroll accompanying the invoice goes to the Prevailing Wage Officer to verify that prevailing wage was paid where required for the project.
 
Step 6:  Final Invoice, Inspection, and Project Closeout
 
When the Secretary/Treasurer receives the Final Invoice, they designate a person qualified in track inspection to review the completed project.  When the project is deemed acceptable, the Final Invoice is pad, the project is closed and the file is placed in the ORDC’s archived files.
 
Appendix A
 
PROJECT BRIEFING: CITY OF GREENFIELD,
MIDLAND CITY TO GREENFIELD LINE BRIDGE REHABILITATION
 
January 20, 2011
 
                        Project Costs                                                              Project Benefits
            ORDC Grant                $235,000                 Helps Re-Open Rail Service to Johnson Controls
            City of Greenfield up to $58,000                       Helps Restore 120 Rail-Dependent Jobs
                                                                                               
 
INTRODUCTION: ORDC staff recommends approval of a grant of $235,000 to the City of Greenfield for the rehabilitation of 4 bridges, 4 miles of track, and 8 bridge approaches on the 29.5 mile long Midland City to Greenfield Line.  The work will include platform replacement, bridge tie replacement, walkway removal/replacement, ballast replacement and installation, track raising and other necessary repairs.  Should there be funds remaining from addressing these immediate needs, the purchase and installation of additional bridge ties and ditch cleaning will be advanced.  The $235,000 in ORDC work will be matched by the Indiana and Ohio Railway’s engineering expertise and contributions from the City of Greenfield. 
 
BACKGROUND:  
 
Brief History of the Line:  The Midland City to Greenfield Line was formerly part of the CSX Transportation east coast to St. Louis mainline. In the early 1980’s, CSX discontinued using most of the Ohio portion of this line as mainline track, abandoning some portions, and operating others as branch lines. In 1987, CSX filed to abandon the 29.5 miles of branchline operations between Midland City and Greenfield because it was losing money for CSX.  At that time, the major shippers were two grain elevators as well as two manufacturing plants, Packaging Resources, and Johnson Controls.  Candle-lite had a small facility in Leesburg along the line but was not using rail service at the time.  Because the line had heavy, welded rail, the net liquidation value of the 29.5 miles of track was high, $2,400,000. 
 
The shippers and prospective shippers along the line formed the Greenfield Shippers Association (GSA) to preserve the line.  The Ohio Department of Transportation, Division of Rail (ODOT Rail) worked with the GSA, the City of Greenfield, and the fledgling Indiana & Ohio Railroad (I&ORY) to save the line from being torn up.  ODOT Rail provided $1,341,966 in Federal Railroad Administration funds and $346,034 in State funds to the City of Greenfield to help it to acquire the line.  The GSA and I&ORY provided $712,000 toward the purchase.  The City has owned and the I&ORY has operated the line under a lease with the City since the City purchased the line in 1988.
 
Initially, the Greenfield Line connected to the CSX Midland Subdivision Line between Columbus and Cincinnati.  In October, 2004, RailAmerica, the parent company of the I&ORY, obtained a long term lease for the Midland Sub from CSX.   The Greenfield Line now has direct access via I&ORY and RailAmerica lines to interchange traffic in Cincinnati and various other connecting points on the CSX, Norfolk Southern, and Canadian National.  A map of the southwest Ohio area is included as Exhibit “A”.
 
Initially, the grain traffic provided the base for rail operations.  However, grain traffic diverted to trucks to local consumers or to the Ohio River to be loaded on barges.  The traffic generated by Candle-lite (inbound paraffin) helped replace the grain traffic as Candle-lite grew from a small company with a few dozen employees to a sizable manufacturing concern which now employs about 667 people in Leesburg and 62 people in sales and marketing in Blue Ash.  Packaging Resources (in New Vienna) was acquired by Huhtamaki and currently employs about 250 people.  It receives inbound plastics via rail. Johnson Controls in Greenfield mothballed its Greenfield operations in 2008 which had been receiving hazmat chemicals by rail used to produce foam products. 
 
Recently, Johnson Controls has begun the process of re-opening the Greenfield plant and will begin to employ approximately 120 people while the plant runs at half capacity (one production line) initially, with plans to open the second production line sometime in 2011.  The plant had employed 220 people before it was closed, and will return to that approximate level once both lines are restored.  Early startup of the plant will use truck service, but rail is required for continued competition in the market.  Once this rail service is begun, Johnson Controls will require 70-75 carloads yearly, with this demand ramping up to approximately 145 carloads yearly once the second production line is restored.
 
In 2009, ORDC provided the City with a $210,000 grant matched by $50,000 from the City’s railroad fund, (funds raised by a $60 per car charge that both the shippers and I&ORY (i.e. $120 per car) pay into the City fund).  The work performed was the installation of 2,600 ties from MP 45 to MP 49, MP 67.5 to MP 70, and MP 74 to MP 75.5, the repair of turnouts at MP 56.9 and MP 64.2, and surfacing where ties were installed.  In November 2010, ORDC provided the city with a $130,000 grant matched by $95,270 in work already performed by the City to install 1,600 ties from MP 50.3 to MP 51, MP 52.3 to MP 55.5, MP 57.5 to MP 58, and at the Leesburg Siding and associated surfacing where the ties were installed. 
 
Current Situation: Traffic on the Greenfield Line has dropped off in recent years.  In 2004, the line generated 867 carloads of traffic and in 2005 traffic volumes rose to 922.  However in 2006 traffic dropped to 621 cars.  In 2007 traffic totaled 552 cars and in 2008 traffic totaled 542 cars.  With the recession in 2008, and the mothballing of Johnson Controls, traffic dropped to 394 cars in 2009.  For 2010, the line generated 336 cars in the first 10 months of the year.
 
The City is responsible for rail line maintenance using the railroad fund to perform necessary tasks.  The downturn in railroad traffic has made this job much tougher.  The City is working with the I&ORY to develop ways to cut maintenance costs.
 
The condition of the Greenfield Line is generally good with track speeds generally at 25 MPH. 
 
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project consists of bridge work at bridges with a repair priority of “2,” which are the most needed repairs to the bridges on the line, and various track rehabilitation items required for safe service and to prevent further deterioration.  Current immediate repairs consist of replacing lookout platforms and bridge ties, replacing a riser block, raising the approaches to four bridges (both sides) and replacing or removing walkways on the bridges, and repairing washouts, and replacing ballast on the track itself.  The total work estimate is presented below:
 
Greenfield to Midland City Bridge Rehabilitation Costs
 
                        Item                                                    Unit Cost                                Total Cost
 
                        MP 68 to 72, Repair Wash Outs, add 1,000 Tons/Ballast                $20,000
                        ($10/ton ballast, $10/ton install)
                        Raise Bridge Approaches (#65.2, 65.93, 67.65 & 69.4)                    $20,000
                        ($2/foot)
                        #65.93 Replace 4 Lookout Platforms                                                $19,000
                        #67.65 Replace Lookout Platforms                                                   $19,000
                        #67.65 Replace 1/3 bridge ties                                                           $45,000
                        #67.65 Replace Riser Block – Pier 1                                                 $45,000
                        #74.30 Remove walkway/Install 4 Lookouts                                    $24,000
                        #74.51 Replace or remove walkway                                                   $8,000
                        Johnson Controls #3 Replace missing walkway planks                   $16,000
                        Mobilization and Material Freight                                                    $26,600
                        Total                                                                                                  $242,600
 
Should this work be completed and funds be remaining, the additional work to be funded is outlined below:
 
Item                                                    Unit Cost                                Total Cost
 
#67.65 Replace remaining 2/3 bridge ties                                          $90,000
MP 68 to 72, Clean Ditches                                                                $30,000
 
 
The City will let competitive bids for the track work.  The I&ORY will inspect the project work.  The City will be responsible for continued maintenance of the track.
 
WHY ORDC FUNDING IS NEEDED:  The economics of the line preclude private financing for all the capital needs on the line.
 
PROJECT BENEFITS:
 
  • Necessary to re-open Johnson Controls’ Greenfield plant, creating 130 new jobs.
  • Required for future re-activation of second production line in 2011, creating another 80 jobs.
  • Brings an additional 70-75 yearly carloads initially and 145 yearly carloads over the long-term.
  • Other businesses in the area depend upon the continued viability of the rail-dependent shippers on the Greenfield Line.
SPECIAL CONTINGENCIES: ORDC’s Secretary-Treasurer will decide whether to take project funding from GRF funds, or from funds returned to ORDC from the salvaging of track that had been acquired with federal funds.
 
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS:  The City of Greenfield will provide up to $58,000 of the funding.
 
AMENDED PROJECT BRIEFING UPDATE: CITY OF GREENFIELD,
MIDLAND CITY TO GREENFIELD LINE BRIDGE REHABILITATION
May 5, 2011
 
                        Project Costs                                                              Project Benefits
            ORDC Grant                         $235,000                     Maximizes ORDC’s funding 
            ORDC EOY cleanout    up to $35,000                     See Attached Briefing
            City of Greenfield         up to $58,000                    
                                                  up to $328,000                                
 
INTRODUCTION: At the January 20, 2011 Commission Meeting, ORDC Commissioners through Resolution 11-03 approved a grant of $230,000 to the City of Greenfield for the repair of bridges along the Greenfield Line to ensure it is ready to accommodate Johnson Control traffic when it reopens its Greenfield plant in late Spring.  ORDC Staff recommends that ORDC Commissioners approve an amendment to Resolution 11-03 that would increase ORDC funding for this project and expand the scope of work. The City of Greenfield requested that the scope be augmented to include work beyond the bridge repairs initially identified.
 
ORDC Staff is working on the final accounting of funds for FY 2011 to pay for any and all administrative and project expenses remaining in this fiscal year which ends on June 30, 2011.  ORDC staff recommends approval of up to $35,000 of ORDC General Revenue Funds, which will be the result of end of year (EOY) “account sweeping” be applied to the Greenfield Line Bridge Rehabilitation project. These funds are currently estimated to be approximately $32,000, but this number may increase to up to $35,000, or decrease, including the potential that $0 may be available.
 
SITUATION: Every year, ORDC staff sweeps all General Revenue Fund (GRF) accounts to ensure the maximum amount of GRF funding possible is spent on track rehabilitation and economic development projects.  ORDC staff requests Commissioners’ approval to use the Greenfield Bridge Rehabilitation project to help sweep accounts. Whatever is left in GRF accounts would be applied toward the additional work outlined below.  ORDC expects that the ORDC contribution will be approximately $32,000 but it may be more or less than this figure, including the potential that there will be no funds remaining.  Attached as “Exhibit A” to this amended briefing is the original briefing. 
 
AMENDED Greenfield to Midland City Bridge Rehabilitation Scope of Work*
 
                        Item                                                                                        Estimated Costs
                        MP 68 to 72, Repair Wash Outs, up to 1,000 Tons/Ballast             $25,000
                        MP 67 to 74, Repair Wash Outs/Ditching, 1,000 tons Riprap         $42,000
                        Raise Bridge Approaches (# 65.93, 67.65 & 69.4 & JC#3)             $15,000
                        #65.93 Replace or Repair 4 Lookout Platforms                                $8,000
                        #67.65 Replace or Repair Lookout Platforms                                   $4,000
                        #67.65 Replace 204 (i.e. all) bridge ties                                        $102,000
                        #67.65 Replace or Repair Riser Block – Pier 1                              $20,000
                        #74.30 Remove walkway/Install 4 Lookouts                                  $15,000
                        #74.51 Replace or remove walkway                                                 $2,000
                        Johnson Controls #3 Remove Walkway                                            $3,500
                        #65.93 Replace  Bridge Timbers as Needed                                   $20,000
                        #74.30 Replace  Bridge Timbers as Needed                                   $20,000
                        Additional Ditching (& clean ditches/culverts) as Needed           $15,000
                        Tie Replacement as Needed                                                            $15,000
                        Other Track and Bridge Work As Needed                                     $10,000
                        Bid Bond                                                                                            $4,500
                        Mobilization and Material Freight                                                   $7,000
                        Total                                                                                               $328,000         
 
                        *Amended items and costs italicized; original work items and costs not italicized
Actual work performed will be prioritized by ORDC, Greenfield, and I&ORY consultation and concurrence.
 
 fig 5.png

Figure 5 Map arrows indicate City of Greenfield-owned rail line
 
Appendix B
 
PROJECT BRIEFING:
CASE FARMS FEED MILL OFF SITE RAIL
 
January 8, 2008
 
                        Project Costs                                                                          Project Benefits
            * ORDC Grant                                 $200,000                     * 20 New Jobs at Case Feed Mill
            * Case, Local, & RR Funds             $100,000                   * 200 New Jobs at Processing Plant
                                                                                                         * 350 to 1,300 Carloads Generated
                                                                                                         * 150 to 350 Acres Opened to Rail
 
INTRODUCTION:  Case Farms LLC requests a $200,000 grant to help defray the costs of rebuilding 1,750 feet of an out of service lead track and building a new 800 foot long storage track along this out of service lead. These track improvements are needed before rail service to a new Case Farms feed mill in Massillon can begin.
 
BACKGROUND
 
Rail Related Industrial Development in Area:  The Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway (W&LE) “Asylum Track” spur line (so named because it was used years ago to deliver supplies to an institution located on a now abandoned and torn out portion of the line) branches off the W&LE Brewster to Canton mainline.  This spur has been instrumental in the economic development of the southern portion of Massillon through which it runs.  The Asylum track acts as a lead track from which W&LE  serves a variety of spur tracks including those to Sterilite, Polymer Packaging, Poly One, 84 Lumber, Land O’ Lakes, People’s Cartage, and National Lime and Stone. ORDC helped with some of this economic development by providing a $45,000 grant and $145,500 loan for the People’s Cartage rail spur and a $200,000 grant for the Sterilite rail spur. The map included herein as Exhibit “A” shows the W&LE rail system in the Massillon area.
 
The northernmost 1,750 feet of the Asylum spur has been out of service for 37 years. The northern end of the line was abandoned as part of the project to build the four lane US 30 divided highway through Massillon and Canton.  This track provides the western border of the Massillon Development Foundation’s (MDF) Neocom I Industrial Park.  The northern edge of the park is bordered by US 30.  The Neocom park currently has about 175 acres of shovel ready property for development.  In addition, MDF and local developers are in the process of acquiring about 200 acres of adjacent land.  The satellite photograph included as Exhibit “B” shows the Neocom Industrial Park area as well as the rail which will be needed for the Case feed mill.
 
Case Farms:  Case Farms LLC was established in 1986 in Ohio as a poultry processing company. It has since expanded to North Carolina. In Ohio, Case contracts out with local farmers in a 12 county area to raise chickens in small chicken houses, usually about 40,000 sq. ft. each. Case provides the chicks, the feed, and a program for raising the birds.  Case currently employs 250 people at its Winesburg processing plant in Holmes County.  This plant currently processes 375,000 chickens a week.  Case sells its poultry products to a variety of businesses including restaurants, processed food producers, dog food producers, and other businesses in the food industry.
Winesburg has no rail service so Case currently gets all of its feed, primarily soy and corn, in via trucks.
 
Case has been working with W&LE officials for several years on plans to build a feed mill central to its contract chicken growers, its hatchery, and its processing plant.  Case would continue to buy local grain for truck delivery but recognizes that if its processing plant is to grow, grain must be procured from non-local sources.  Rail delivery is needed to keep transportation costs down.  Case has selected a 20 acre site in the Neocom Industrial Park for its feed mill operations.  If Case gets one half of its feed stock in via rail, it will generate 1,300 new carloads of freight. Case will be making the following investments in Ohio expansion:
 
                                      $9 Million                 Expansion of Winesburg Operations
                                    $13 Million                 Establishing a Feed Mill in Massillon
                                       $425,000                  2,500 ft. On Site Rail Spur at Feed Mill
 
These investments will enable Case to increase its Winesburg chicken production to 800,000 birds a week.  
 
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:   To repair the 1,750 ft. out of service portion of the Asylum Lead track will require the total rebuilding of the track.  The scope of work is as follows.
 
  • Brush cutting up to 1,750 ft.
  • Removing existing 1,750 ft. of track.
  • Clearing and grubbing up to 1,750 ft. up to 30 feet from track centerline.
  • Grading and ditching up to 1,750 ft. where track removed.
  • Installing up to 1,750 ft of 304 sub-ballast.
  • Building 1,750 ft. of new track including ballast, ties, and rail as well as related work.
 
The W&LE estimates this work will cost approximately $225,000. 
 
In addition, an 800 ft. long new rail spur will be needed along the Asylum lead for car storage.  Currently, some of the cars from 25 car unit trains of stone going into the National Lime facility at the end of the in service portion of the Asylum track are stored on the lead.  This storage would block access to Case’s new feed mill which would result in congestion and poor service to Case. The W&LE estimates the 800 ft. spur will cost approximately $75,000 making total off site rail project costs approximately $300,000.  The MDF is procuring a detailed engineer’s estimate for the project.  The track work for both the 1,750 ft. Asylum lead reconstruction and the new 800 ft. spur will be bid out.  The W&LE, Case Farms, or the Massillon Development Foundation will be responsible for track maintenance.
 
Case will provide the $200,000 in ORDC grant funds toward the estimated $300,000 total off site rail costs.  The Ohio Department of Development is providing Case with a $50,000 Rapid Outreach grant which will also be used for the off-site rail costs.  In addition, Case will direct the money it will garner from its State Job Creation Tax Credit toward the off-site rail project. Any remaining off site rail costs will be covered by Case, National Lime and Stone, the MDF, and/or the W&LE.  It has not yet been determined who will pay for the remaining costs.
 
The new feed mill in Massillon and the Winesburg expansion will be operational by March, 2009.  Therefore, off site rail needs to be built in the 2008 construction season.
 
WHY IS ORDC FUNDING NEEDED:  ORDC funding is needed to get the off-site rail portion of the project done as an incentive for Case Farms to go forward with its planned expansion and to continue to grow in Ohio.
 
PROJECT BENEFITS:
 
  • 20 new jobs at the feed mill.
  • 200 new jobs at the Winesburg operations.
  • 350 to 1,300 new carloads a year.
  • 150 to 350 of shovel ready acreage opened up to future rail dependent development.
  • Each rail carloads of inbound feed will keep from 3 to 6 trucks off Ohio roads.
 
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS: 1) W&LE will provide cost effective, very long term rates; 2) MDF will provide a $75,000 discount for land purchase; and 3) the City of Massillon is providing tax abatement for the feed mill.
 
SPECIAL CONTINGENCIES:  Staff recommends that Commissioners approve the full $200,000 grant on the following conditions: 1) the clawback provisions in the ORDC grant agreement reflect that Case must create 200 jobs and generate 350 rail cars per year within 3 years of project completion; 2) either Case, MFD, or W&LE provide ORDC a written commitment to be responsible for all off site rail maintenance; and 3) any gap in off-site rail funding is filled.  Staff recommends that until and unless these three conditions are met, no ORDC funds be encumbered for the rail project.  Further, if these conditions are not met before April 15, 2008, ORDC will postpone any funding for the project until FY 2009 which begins July 1, 2008.
 fig 6.jpg
Figure 6 Case Farms Rail Spur Project
 
Appendix C
 
SHIPPER SURVEY  FOR ORDC REHABILITATION PROJECTS
 
Introduction:
  • ORDC Considering funding for track serving your company.
  • Rail user input is valuable to understand importance of RR service.
  • RR provided contact information.
Background on Company:
  • What are basics of your plant’s operations? Products? Customers? Suppliers? Major Competitors?
  • How does your plant fit into the overall corporate structure (if applicable)?  Do other plants do the same thing? Is your plant state of the art, or more modern than competitors within your corporation or outside of your corporation?  (Other follow- up questions as needed to figure out if the plant has long term viability.)
  • Does your company have any expansion plan for the foreseeable future?
  • What is the employment at the plant now?  After expansion (if any)?
Background on Transportation Issues:
  • How many times a week do you get rail service?  Is that enough?
  • Other than frequency, how is your current rail service?  Any issues or problems with spotting cars or demurrage or the like?
  • Outbound: Cars/Yr.? What is shipped outbound?  What percent of outbound is rail?  Is rail (or more rail) possible for outbound?
  • Inbound: Cars/Yr.? What is shipped inbound?  What percent of inbound is rail?  Is rail (or more rail) possible for inbound?
  • What is the alternative to your current rail use? Truck? Transload? Barge?  Is the alternative economically feasible?
  • What increases or decreases in rail use do you foresee?
  • (For select projects where service levels would increase because of higher track speeds or other reasons.)  Would your rail use go up if you had more frequent rail service?  Why?
  • Any other issues that have not been covered that you want to address?