I have 2 concerns with PID 100887.
First, it looks as though only 1 foot of additional clearance between the high water level and the bottom of the proposed bridge (MIN. TRAFFICKED WATERWAY, CLEAR TO MAXIMUM POOL: EXISTING = 4.75 FEET - PROPOSED 5.76 FEET]. It is difficult (sometimes impossible) to clear a larger boat under the current bridge when there is high water. Are there any alternate plans which would give additional clearance?
My second concern / question has to do with not being able to see vehicles on SR279 when stopped at Tommy Been Rd at SR279 (especially vehicles coming east on SR279 towards Tommy Been). Will the view of vehicle traffic on SR279 be improved for those on Tommy Been Rd? I could not tell from the drawings.
Will there be any public meetings regarding this project?
I'd appreciate your comments.